themcglynn.com/theliberal.net

08 Feb

Blackwater, Now Xe, Vying For $1 Billion Contract To Train Afghan National Police

A contender to be a key part of President Barack Obama’s strategy for stabilizing the country,” theAP reported recently

Afghan Police

“Blackwater Worldwide’s legal woes haven’t dimmed the company’s prospects in Afghanistan, where it’s a contender to be a key part of President Barack Obama’s strategy for stabilizing the country,” the AP reported recently.

Now called Xe Services, the company is in the running for a Pentagon contract potentially worth $1 billion to train Afghanistan’s troubled national police force. Xe has been shifting to training, aviation and logistics work after its security guards were accused of killing unarmed Iraqi civilians more than two years ago.
Yet even with a new name and focus, the expanded role would seem an unlikely one for Xe because Democrats have held such a negative opinion of the company following the Iraqi deaths, which are still reverberating in Baghdad and Washington.

During the presidential campaign, then-Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, now Obama’s secretary of state, backed legislation to ban Blackwater and other private security contractors from Iraq.

Xe eventually lost its license to operate as guardian of U.S. diplomats in Iraq and the State Department, with Clinton at the helm, elected not to rehire the company when the contract expired in 2009. Delays in getting a new company in place led to a temporary extension of the State contract.

Derrick Crowe of Rethink Afghanistan notes that Xe is in the running for this contract “despite the fact that they’ve ‘trained’ the notoriously corrupt and incompetent Afghan Border Police. Recently, two Blackwater / Xe trainers were indicted for murdering Afghan civilians, and the company has a history of hiring people with a criminal record. Xe Services / Blackwater is a liability to the American cause around the world and doesn’t deserve another dime of taxpayer money.”

Rethink Afghanistan has posted a new video on the topic featuring Afghanistan-based correspondent Anand Gopal.




  • Share/Bookmark
08 Feb

Costa Rica elects first woman president, inspiring the region

Laura Chinchilla won Costa Rica’s presidential election in a landslide victory Sunday that is eliciting cheers from women across Central America.

National Liberation Party candidate Laura Chinchilla, accompanied by members of her party, greets supporters after winning Costa Rica’s presidency in a landslide on Sunday.

Esteban Felix/AP

By Chrissie Long Correspondent, Sara Miller Llana Staff writer / February 8, 2010

San Jose, Costa Rica; and Panama City Center-right politician Laura Chinchilla is set to become Costa Rica’s first woman president after a landslide victory Sunday that is invigorating women in the tiny Central American nation and beyond.

Ms. Chinchilla received 46.8 percent of the votes, winning Sunday’s presidential election in the first round. Her closest competition, left-leaning candidate Ottón Solís, captured just 25.1 percent of votes. Close on his heels in third place was Libertarian candidate Otto Guevara who received 20.9 percent.

“It’s a significant moment in Costa Rica’s history, to have a woman president,” says Fernando Zeledón, political science professor at the University of Costa Rica. “It’s a new chapter in history.”

With her parents, husband, and 13-year-old son standing behind her, Chinchilla accepted the presidential victory Sunday night by pledging to make Costa Rica the first developed country in Central America, confirming her commitment to the goal to go carbon neutral by 2021, and promising to improve health and citizen safety. She asked Costa Ricans “to help to bring forward this immense responsibility.”

Her speech was also one of gratitude as she thanked campaign workers and voters for “making it possible for a daughter of Costa Rica to, today, be president of the country.”

Vote reverberates across the region

“I couldn’t be happier” says Chinchilla fan Laura Urena, wrapped in a National Liberation Party flag at the victory celebration. “It’s the first time in the history of Costa Rica that we will have a woman president. It will give new opportunities to women all over the country.”

Chinchilla is not Central America´s first female president. Nicaragua was led by Violeta Chamorro in the 1990s. Nearly a decade later, Panama elected Mireya Moscoso, its first female president.

Still, Chinchilla’s victory is already reverberating among women across the region.

“[President Moscoso] opened the doors for our gender to show its capabilities,” says Laura Rangel, a hotel receptionist in Panama City. And she says Chinchilla´s victory in Costa Rica will inspire women throughout Central America. “It is marvelous. It is an example for all underdeveloped countries that they can be run by a woman, not just a man.”

Why Chinchilla won

Chinchilla, a former vice president and public security minister, led polls since her campaign was launched in June. Her popularity owes in part to her predecessor, Oscar Arias, a second-term president and Nobel Peace Prize winner who recently made headlines for his role in the Honduran mediation process and who boasts a 73 percent approval rating.

“Oscar Arias’s government has been a successful one and the only option to carry that forward is to elect Laura,” says Esteban González, a 28-year-old archivist, who campaigned outside a voting station for her throughout the day.

Mr. Zeledón says a series of factors led to her clear victory Sunday. “Laura drew her support from many areas. There were some who wanted to see a woman president and others who wanted continuity in the government. The rest of her support was a result of the machine that is the National Liberation Party,” he says, explaining that party organization and favor with the voters secured her a wide margin.

Often described as an independent thinker and skilled diplomat, Chinchilla found support on the campaign trail from voters such as Xinia Vargas Alvarado.

“Costa Rica is ready for a woman president,” says Ms. Vargas Alvarado, outside a polling station Sunday. “We think she will do a better job with … issues of childcare, single motherhood, and housing.”

Yirlamia Pessoa who came to the polls with her two daughters, Danisha and Yariela, agrees. “We think she will better understand the issues facing women,” she says.

Who she is

Born in Desamparados, a working class suburb of the capital San José, Chinchilla grew up watching her father navigate the political scene as the country’s comptroller for 15 years. The eldest of four children and only daughter, she studied political science at the University of Costa Rica and continued her education at Georgetown University where she received a master’s degree in public policy.

Back in Costa Rica she worked as a consultant on issues relating to security and judicial reform and held her first public office at age 35 as vice minister of public security. Two years later, she became minister of public security, the first woman to serve in that capacity. She was elected to the legislative assembly for a four-year term in 2002 and then served as vice president under President Arias.

  • Share/Bookmark
08 Feb

Iraq & Afghanistan U.S. Occupation Casualties

1226use

U.S. Iraq Occupation Casualties



  • Deaths in Iraq: A look at the faces of American lives lost

    This list includes fatal U.S. government casualties  military and civilian in the  Occupation Of Iraq.  Its totals will usually be slightly less than those in media reports because they are based on Defense Department reports of each casualty’s name and other personal details, which are not released until next of kin are notified. The information is cross-checked with reports by the Associated Press and local news media and periodic updates by the Defense Department. The list for U.S. casualties in the Occupation of Afghanistan is below.


    • Total To Date:

    • Killed: 4,383*

      *Includes eight soldiers who died from their wounds but not listed as such by the Pentagon. One of the unnamed:

      Wounded: Can not find a reliable source.

      In addition thousands upon thousands of soldiers have suffered and are continuing to suffer from PTS and a broad spectrum of mental illnesses.

    • Names of the Dead

    • Recent Confirmations

    • Pfc. Scott G. Barnett, 24, of Concord, Calif., died Jan. 28 in Tallil, Iraq, of injuries sustained while supporting combat operations. He was assigned to the 412th Aviation Support Battalion, 12th Combat Aviation Brigade, Katterbach, Germany.
    • Pfc. Scott G. Barnett, 24, of Concord, Calif., died Jan. 28 in Tallil, Iraq, of injuries sustained while supporting combat operations. He was assigned to the 412th Aviation Support Battalion, 12th Combat Aviation Brigade, Katterbach, Germany

    Yet To Be Named

    None

    • For Other Iraq Casualties since June 1, 2009 see page:

    Iraq & Afghanistan Occupation Confirmed U.S Casualties – Since June 1, 2009

    1228

    U.S. Afghanistan Occupation Casualties



    Deaths in Afghanistan: A look at the faces of American lives lost

    This list includes fatal U.S. government casualties  military and civilian in the  Occupation Of Afghanistan. Its totals will usually be slightly less than those in media reports because they are based on Defense Department reports of each casualty’s name and other personal details, which are not released until next of kin are notified. The information is cross-checked with reports by the Associated Press and local news media and periodic updates by the Defense Department.

    Total To Date:

    Killed: 984

    Wounded: Can not find a reliable source.

    Names of the Dead

    Recent Confirmations

    Sgt. Dillon B. Foxx, 22, of Traverse City, Mich., died Feb. 5 in Bala Murghab, Afghanistan, of wounds suffered when enemy forces attacked his unit with an improvised explosive device. He was assigned to the 1st Battalion, 508th Parachute Infantry Regiment, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, Fort Bragg, N.C.

    Sgt. 1st Class David J. Hartman, 27, of Okinawa, Japan. He was assigned to the 96th Civil Affairs Battalion (Airborne), 95th Civil Affairs Brigade (Airborne), Fort Bragg, N.C…died Feb. 3 in Timagara, Pakistan, from wounds suffered when insurgents attacked their unit with an improvised explosive device.

     Sgt. 1st Class Matthew S. Sluss-Tiller, 35, of Callettsburg, Ky. He was assigned to the 96th Civil Affairs Battalion (Airborne), 95th Civil Affairs Brigade (Airborne), Fort Bragg, N.C…died Feb. 3 in Timagara, Pakistan, from wounds suffered when insurgents attacked their unit with an improvised explosive device.

     Staff Sgt. Mark A. Stets, 39, of El Cajon, Calif. He was assigned to the 8th Psychological Operations Battalion (Airborne), 4th Psychological Operations Group (Airborne), Fort Bragg, N.C…died Feb. 3 in Timagara, Pakistan, from wounds suffered when insurgents attacked their unit with an improvised explosive device.

     Pfc. Zachary G. Lovejoy, 20, of Albuquerque, N.M…died of wounds suffered when enemy forces attacked their vehicle with an improvised explosive device Feb. 2 in Zabul province, Afghanistan. They were assigned to the 1st Battalion, 508th Parachute Infantry Regiment, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, Fort Bragg, N.C.Capt. Daniel Whitten, 28, of Grimes, Iowa…died of wounds suffered when enemy forces attacked their vehicle with an improvised explosive device Feb. 2 in Zabul province, Afghanistan. They were assigned to the 1st Battalion, 508th Parachute Infantry Regiment, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, Fort Bragg, N.C.

    Sgt. Carlos E. Gill, 25, of Fayetteville, N.C., died Jan. 26 at Walter Reed Army Medical Center of an illness. He was evacuated from Kandahar Air Field, Afghanistan, Dec. 19, 2009, where he was supporting combat operations. Gill was assigned to the 2nd Battalion, 1st Infantry Regiment, 5th Stryker Brigade Combat Team, 2nd Infantry Division, Fort Lewis, Wash.

    Lance Cpl. Jeremy M. Kane, 22, of Towson, Md., died Jan. 23 while supporting combat operations in Helmand province, Afghanistan. He was assigned to 4th Light Armored Reconnaissance Battalion, 4th Marine Division, Marine Forces Reserve, based out of Camp Pendleton, Calif.

    Lance Cpl. Timothy J. Poole, 22, of Bowling Green, Ky…assigned to 1st Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, 3rd Marine Division, III Marine Expeditionary Force, Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii.

    Lance Cpl. Zachary D. Smith, 19, of Hornell, N.Y…assigned to 1st Battalion, 6th Marine Regiment, 2nd Marine Division, II Marine Expeditionary Force, Camp Lejeune, N.C… died Jan. 24 while supporting combat operations in Helmand province

    Sgt. Daniel M. Angus, 28, of Thonotosassa, Fla..assigned to 1st Battalion, 6th Marine Regiment, 2nd Marine Division, II Marine Expeditionary Force, Camp Lejeune, N.C… died Jan. 24 while supporting combat operations in Helmand province

    For Other Afghanistan Casualties since June 1, 2009 see page:

    Iraq & Afghanistan Occupation Confirmed U.S Casualties – Since June 1, 2009

    ***************************************

     

    • Share/Bookmark
    08 Feb

    Events of Interest

     
    Deputy leader of Yemen-based group praises bin Laden for US plane bombing bid.
     
     
    Tehran informs UN atomic agency that processing will begin in less than 24 hours.
     

    ***********************************************

     FOCUS: FEATURES, ANALYSIS AND COMMENT
     
     
     
    US-backed security operations in the West Bank reinforce bitter political divide.
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Before his death, Hamas military commander Mahmoud al-Mabhouh spoke to Al Jazeera.
     
     
     
    Yemen-based religious scholar says he supports attempt to blow up a US-bound plane.
     
     
     
    Rob Reynolds returns to Port-au-Prince to find that aid is flowing but too little has

    • Share/Bookmark
    07 Feb

    For the People of Iran

    For the People of Iran

    • Share/Bookmark
    30 Jan

    Hope for Haiti Now

    Donate Now: 1-877-99-HAITI in US/Canada, or go to www.hopeforhaitinow.org

    ***********************************************************

    Donate Now: 1-877-99-HAITI in US/Canada,

    or go to www.hopeforhaitinow.org

    kid21


    • Share/Bookmark
    31 Jan

    The State of the Union Is Comatose

    A year in, we have learned that all the conciliatory rhetoric won’t cut it. But a president with a big megaphone and large legislative majorities has more powerful strings to pull, no matter what happened in one special election in Massachusetts. If he can’t get a working government, at least he can shake things up in November.

    By FRANK RICH, NYT  Op-Ed Columnist, January 31, 2010

    HANDS down, the State of the Union’s big moment was Barack Obama’s direct hit on the delicate sensibilities of the Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito. The president was right to blast the 5-to-4 decision giving corporate interests an even greater stranglehold over a government they already regard as a partially owned onshore subsidiary. How satisfying it was to watch him provoke Alito into a “You lie!” snit. Here was a fight we could believe in.

    There was more to admire in Obama’s performance as well. He did not retreat into the bite-size initiatives — V-chips, school uniforms — embraced by an emasculated Bill Clinton after his midterm pummeling of 1994. The president’s big original goals — health care, economic recovery, financial reform — remained nominally intact, as did his sense of humor. In a rhetorical touch William Safire would have relished, Obama had the wit to rush the ritualistic “our union is strong” so it would not prompt the usual jingoistic ovation.

    Good thing, too, since our union is not strong. It is paralyzed. Many Americans were more eagerly anticipating Steve Jobs’s address in San Francisco on Wednesday morning than the president’s that night because they have far more confidence in Apple than Washington to produce concrete change. One year into Obama’s term we still don’t know whether he has what it takes to get American governance functioning again. But we do know that no speech can do the job. The president must act. Only body blows to the legislative branch can move the country forward.

    The historian Alan Brinkley has observed that we will soon enter the fourth decade in which Congress — and therefore government as a whole — has failed to deal with any major national problem, from infrastructure to education. The gridlock isn’t only a function of polarized politics and special interests. There’s also been a gaping leadership deficit.

    In Obama’s speech, he kept circling back to a Senate where both parties are dysfunctional. The obstructionist Republicans, he observed, will say no to every single bill “just because they can.” But no less culpable are the Democrats, who maintain “the largest majority in decades” even after losing Teddy Kennedy’s seat — and yet would rather “run for the hills” than accomplish anything.

    Click to continue reading “The State of the Union Is Comatose”

    • Share/Bookmark
    31 Jan

    How to Reform Our Financial System

    Apart from the risks inherent in these activities, they also present virtually insolvable conflicts of interest with customer relationships, conflicts that simply cannot be escaped by an elaboration of so-called Chinese walls between different divisions of an institution.

    r-volcker-hugeuse


    By PAUL VOLCKER, Op-Ed Contributor, January 31, 2010

    PRESIDENT OBAMA 10 days ago set out one important element in the needed structural reform of the financial system. No one can reasonably contest the need for such reform, in the United States and in other countries as well. We have after all a system that broke down in the most serious crisis in 75 years. The cost has been enormous in terms of unemployment and lost production. The repercussions have been international.

    Aggressive action by governments and central banks — really unprecedented in both magnitude and scope — has been necessary to revive and maintain market functions. Some of that support has continued to this day. Here in the United States as elsewhere, some of the largest and proudest financial institutions — including both investment and commercial banks — have been rescued or merged with the help of massive official funds. Those actions were taken out of well-justified concern that their outright failure would irreparably impair market functioning and further damage the real economy already in recession.

    Now the economy is recovering, if at a still modest pace. Funds are flowing more readily in financial markets, but still far from normally. Discussion is underway here and abroad about specific reforms, many of which have been set out by the United States administration: appropriate capital and liquidity requirements for banks; better official supervision on the one hand and on the other improved risk management and board oversight for private institutions; a review of accounting approaches toward financial institutions; and others.

    As President Obama has emphasized, some central structural issues have not yet been satisfactorily addressed.

    A large concern is the residue of moral hazard from the extensive and successful efforts of central banks and governments to rescue large failing and potentially failing financial institutions. The long-established “safety net” undergirding the stability of commercial banks — deposit insurance and lender of last resort facilities — has been both reinforced and extended in a series of ad hoc decisions to support investment banks, mortgage providers and the world’s largest insurance company. In the process, managements, creditors and to some extent stockholders of these non-banks have been protected.

    Click to continue reading “How to Reform Our Financial System”

    • Share/Bookmark
    31 Jan

    Blair has shown himself more a fool than a liar

    A protest poster outside the inquiry in central London on Friday

    The most revealing thing was how little he understood about the situation on the ground.

    ********************************************

    January 31, 2010

    Leading article: The truth on trial

    As much as with Margaret Thatcher and the Falklands, Britain’s role in the Iraq conflict has been personally identified with Tony Blair. He often referred to it as “my decision”, and did so again in his evidence to the Chilcot inquiry on Friday. Yet one of the important themes emerging from the inquiry is the extent to which the Iraq war was a collective enterprise.

    This newspaper, which opposed the war more strenuously and consistently than any other, has always tried to avoid the simple view of the decision-making process as that of an over-mighty prime minister riding roughshod over a supine Cabinet and a feeble House of Commons. Mr Blair was the principal architect of British policy – even if the original mover of the invasion was George Bush – but he was not an absolute monarch.

    It ought to be one of the functions of the Iraq inquiry report, which Sir John Chilcot said on Friday that he hopes to publish at the end of this year, to name the other guilty parties. Sir John did say at the outset that his committee “cannot determine guilt or innocence”, but he went on to say: “We will not shy away from making criticisms where they are warranted.”

    The inquiry has heard more than enough evidence to know that criticisms are warranted. In particular, the new information about the way in which the legal case for war was constructed has vindicated the stance taken by The Independent on Sunday from the start.

    This was not Mr Blair’s responsibility alone. Geoff Hoon, the Defence Secretary; John Scarlett, chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee; Sir Richard Dearlove, head of MI6; Alastair Campbell and Jonathan Powell, at No 10; they all played their part. But Jack Straw, Foreign Secretary, and Lord Goldsmith, Attorney General, were two of the main villains of the piece. Mr Straw, who returns for a second session at the inquiry next week, seems to have regarded it as his job to insulate No 10 from the lawyers in his department, knowing that all 27 regarded military action in Iraq as contrary to international law. Once Mr Straw had lectured his own lawyers on how he knew the law better than they did, and had been proved right in the courts when he disagreed with the lawyers at the Home Office, he turned his attention to writing a long letter to Lord Goldsmith.

    Click to continue reading “Blair has shown himself more a fool than a liar”

    • Share/Bookmark
    01 Feb

    Where’s the movement?

    berlinwallIntro
    In forming his administration, President Obama abandoned the movement that had begun during his campaign for deal-making and a pragmatism that hasn’t worked. That movement is still possible and needed now. Here is a look at what is required, and how a version of it is forming in California.

    glakoff

    AuthorGeorge Lakoff

    We begin with this week’s triple whammy.

    Freedom vs. The Public Option

    Which would you prefer, consumer choice or freedom? Extended coverage or freedom? Bending the cost curve or freedom?

    John Boehner, House Minority Leader, speaking of health care, said recently, “This bill is the greatest threat to freedom that I have seen in the 19 years I have been here in Washington….It’s going to lead to a government takeover of our health care system, with tens of thousands of new bureaucrats right down the street, making these decisions [choose your doctor, buy your own health insurance] for you.”

    This is exactly what Frank Luntz advised conservatives to say. They have repeated it and repeated it. Why has it worked to rally conservative populists against their interests? The most effective framing is more than mere language, more than spin or salesmanship. It has worked because conservatives really believe that the issue is freedom. It fits the conservative moral system. It fits how conservatives see the world.

    The Democrats have helped the conservatives. Their pathetic attempt to make any deal to get 60 votes convinced even Massachusetts voters that government under the Democrats was corrupt and oppressive, not just inept, but immoral.

    All politics is moral

    All political leaders argue that they are doing the right thing, not the wrong thing, that their policies are moral, not evil.

    Conservatives understand this, liberals tend not to. Conservatives know a morality tale when they see it: Greedy Wall Street bankers, who have cost people their homes, their jobs, and their savings get billion-dollar bailouts from the government, while those honest hard-working people get nothing. Corruption. Oppression. A threat to freedom.

    The conservatives are winning the framing wars again — by sticking to moral principles as conservatives see them, and communicating their view of morality effectively. In the 2008 election, Barack Obama ran a campaign based on his moral principles and communicated those principles as effectively as any candidate ever has.

    But the Obama administration made a 180-degree turn, trading Obama’s 2008 moral principles for the deal-making of Rahm Emanuel and Tim Geithner, assuming it would be “pragmatic” to court corporations and move to the right, in the false hope of bipartisan support. A clear unified moral vision was replaced by long laundry lists of policy options that the public could not understand, and that made ordinary folks feel they were being bamboozled. And in many cases, they were.

    Click to continue reading “Where’s the movement?”

    • Share/Bookmark
    01 Feb

    At National Prayer Breakfast, Obama to Address Shadowy Christian Group Tied to Uganda’s ‘Kill the Gays’ Bill

    So why does the president feel he must give his props to a group that often works against the national interest, and whose most prominent congressional members — Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C.; Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., and Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., to name a few — have acted as his nemeses? Power. It’s all about the group’s perceived power in the very structure of the U.S. government. “You don’t want to alienate them,” one religious right leader explained to Sharlet. 

    By Adele M. Stan, AlterNet
    Posted on February 1, 2010, Printed on February 1, 2010
    http://www.alternet.org/story/145366/

     

    The National Prayer Breakfast, an annual Washington exercise attended by politicians of all stripes who wish to demonstrate their piety, is one of those must-go events for the U.S. president, or so the conventional wisdom has it. Every president since Dwight D. Eisenhower has attended.

    But the prayer breakfast, however benign it may seem on the surface, is really a display of power for an underground religious group that often shapes U.S. foreign policy in ways not easy to see, and sometimes at odds the policy goals of the government itself. This Thursday, President Barack Obama is expected to address the gathering, as he did last year. But if there was ever a year for the president to back out, to have a sudden scheduling conflict, it’s this one.

    The breakfast draws leaders from all sectors of society, including a hefty contingent from the military. It’s a coveted invitation.The event is usually the only public sighting of its sponsor,.the shadowy right-wing religious network known as the Family. Around the periphery of the event, the Family does what it does best: bringing together leaders from developing countries of special concern to U.S. business interests with members of Congress and people in government who hold the keys to the foreign aid kingdom.

    “This is the bullying tactics of banality,” said Jeff Sharlet, author of the definitive book, The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power, in an interview with AlterNet. “This is not about a banality of evil, but the evil of banality. The breakfast itself is a very bland event, but it’s surrounded by this week-long lobbying festival which isn’t visible.”

    Introductions are made and meetings arranged for foreign dignitaries through the auspices of a the Family, led for the past 40 years by Washington insider Doug Coe and comprising powerful men from all over the world, including a number of prominent members of Congress. That group of powerful men also includes two behind a controversial anti-gay law in Uganda, proposed by two politicians with strong ties to the Family. The law carries the death penalty for something called “aggravated homosexuality.”

    Click to continue reading “At National Prayer Breakfast, Obama to Address Shadowy Christian Group Tied to Uganda’s ‘Kill the Gays’ Bill”

    • Share/Bookmark
    01 Feb

    Sundance Reveals the Dark Underside of Political Financing in the USA

    “In the United States, bribery is legal and it’s terrifying,”

    by: Romain Raynaldy  |  Les Echos

    At the Sundance Festival, American documentary filmmaker Alex Gibney recounts the descent into hell of the former lobbyist with links to the Republican Party, Jack Abramoff, offering an indictment of the corruption that infects political financing in the United States.

    Filmmaker Alex Gibney’s new documentary, “Casino Jack and the United States of Money” – an expose of US campaign financing focused on Jack Abramoff premiering at the Sundance Festival this week – could hardly be better timed, so soon after the Supreme Court’s “Citizens United” decision.

    Alex Gibney, a Sundance regular, won an Oscar in 2008 with “Taxi to the Dark Side,” a documentary about the acts of torture Americans practiced in Afghanistan, in Iraq and in the prison at Guantanamo.

    His latest film, “Casino Jack and the United States of Money”, is presented in competition at the independent film festival that is taking place in Park City, Utah, until Sunday.

    In the film, the director, in a deeply ironic mode, recounts the glory days and decline of Jack Abramoff – presently serving a six-year prison sentence for bribery – who also took several members of the Republican Party who profited from his largesse down along with him when he fell.

    “In many respects, Abramoff was simultaneously extremely serious and deeply ridiculous,” Alex Gibney declared to AFP. “And some things were too bizarre and amusing to be treated in a serious way. You had to laugh and cry at once. It’s a comedy, but the joke’s on us,” he says.

    Jack Abramoff, a staunch Republican “who saw his life as an action movie” – he was also a movie producer – embodied all the excess of American lobbying, with its millions of dollars spent to attract the good graces of members of Congress.

    Alex Gibney hopes his film will open the eyes of his fellow citizens by “showing people how it works. When you go into the back kitchens of a sausage-making factory, it’s rather frightening. Well, then, this film takes you into the (campaign financing) kitchen and it’s not pretty.”

    “In what other country in the world, aside from the most deeply corrupted ones such as Indonesia or Nigeria, is money as openly distributed to buy and sell political officials? It’s profoundly shocking,” deplores Alex Gibney.

    He considers it was Ronald Reagan’s accession to the presidency in 1981 that saw the United States “change its fundamental principles.” Gibney said, “We made money the sovereign principle through which everything had to be measured: success, failure, and now the political system.

    “In the United States, bribery is legal and it’s terrifying,” the film-maker asserts. Election campaign financing, very lightly supervised in the United States, “is a system that legalizes bribery. How can we put up with that?” he wonders.

    “Abramoff and people like him are political terrorists,” he deems. “They don’t use a revolver, but they want to destroy the government since, fundamentally, they don’t believe in its principles. They believe in a kind of libertarian law of the jungle.”

    The film debuts just as the United States Supreme Court has lifted the limits on corporate financing of national electoral campaigns, a revolution in American electoral law that had limited this right for twenty years.

    Alex Gibney makes the case for “a system of public campaign finance. We must achieve that, or else we’re damned,” he says, nonetheless convinced that it is still “possible to change the situation.”

    In a certain sense, “Jack Abramoff did us a great service,” the filmmaker observes. “He showed us in a spectacular way how bad (the system) was. We should be profoundly grateful to him for that.”

    Translation: Truthout French Language Editor Leslie Thatcher.

    Les Echos is France’s premier business newspaper. Created by the brothers Robert and Emile Servan-Schreiber in 1908, it has been part of the LVMH conglomerate since 2007.

     

    • Share/Bookmark
    02 Feb

    Howard Zinn – Do not quit until all the cards are played

     storyimages_howardzinn_640x755_310x2201

    Articles remembering Howard Zinn

    Howard’s ZNet page. Pieces remembering Zinn:

    Do not quit until all the cards are played

    By Howard Zinn, ZNet
    http://www.alternet.org/story/145499/

    American historian, playwright and social activist Howard Zinn died January 27, 2010, aged 87. His light will shine bright into the far off future. A new socially just world will owe a great debt to Howard and others like him who gave so much of themselves for us. — ZNet Staff

    Below is an excerpt from his recent book A Power Governments Cannot Suppress published by City Lights Books, www.citylights.com. At the bottom of this commentary are links to various ZNet obituaries remembering Howard.

    In this world of war and injustice, how does a person manage to stay socially engaged, committed to the struggle, and remain healthy without burning out or becoming resigned or cynical?

    I am totally confident not that the world will get better, but that we should not give up the game before all the cards have been played. The metaphor is deliberate; life is a gamble. Not to play is to foreclose any chance of winning. To play, to act, is to create at least a possibility of changing the world.

    There is a tendency to think that what we see in the present moment will continue. We forget how often we have been astonished by the sudden crumbling of institutions, by extraordinary changes in people’s thoughts, by unexpected eruptions of rebellion against tyrannies, by the quick collapse of systems of power that seemed invincible.

    What leaps out from the history of the past hundred years is its utter unpredictability. A revolution to overthrow the czar of Russia in that most sluggish of semi feudal empires not only startled the most advanced imperial powers but took Lenin himself by surprise and sent him rushing by train to Petrograd. Who would have predicted the bizarre shifts of World War II-the Nazi-Soviet pact (those embarrassing photos of von Ribbentrop and Molotov shaking hands), and the German army rolling through Russia, apparently invincible, causing colossal casualties, being turned back at the gates of Leningrad, on the western edge of Moscow, in the streets of Stalingrad, followed by the defeat of the German army, with Hitler huddled in his Berlin bunker, waiting to die?

    And then the postwar world, taking a shape no one could have drawn in advance: The Chinese Communist revolution, the tumultuous and violent Cultural Revolution, and then another turnabout, with post-Mao China renouncing its most fervently held ideas and institutions, making overtures to the West, cuddling up to capitalist enterprise, perplexing everyone.

    No one foresaw the disintegration of the old Western empires happening so quickly after the war, or the odd array of societies that would be created in the newly independent nations, from the benign village socialism of Nyerere’s Tanzania to the madness of Idi Amin’s adjacent Uganda. Spain became an astonishment. I recall a veteran of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade telling me that he could not imagine Spanish Fascism being overthrown without another bloody war. But after Franco was gone, a parliamentary democracy came into being, open to Socialists, Communists, anarchists, everyone.

    The end of World War II left two superpowers with their respective spheres of influence and control, vying for military and political power. Yet they were unable to control events, even in those parts of the world considered to be their respective spheres of influence. The failure of the Soviet Union to have its way in Afghanistan, its decision to withdraw after almost a decade of ugly intervention, was the most striking evidence that even the possession of thermonuclear weapons does not guarantee domination over a determined population.

    The United States has faced the same reality. It waged a full-scale war in Indochina, conducting the most brutal bombardment of a tiny peninsula in world history, and yet was forced to withdraw. In the headlines every day we see other instances of the failure of the presumably powerful over the presumably powerless, as in Bolivia and Brazil, where grassroots movements of workers and the poor have elected new presidents pledged to fight destructive corporate power.

    Click to continue reading “Howard Zinn – Do not quit until all the cards are played”

    • Share/Bookmark
    03 Feb

    U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan, Karl Eikenberry.

    brave-new-foundation1

    Watch the video

    1. Watch the video
    2. Sign the Act.ly Petition

    Dear Friend,

    This year, 30,000 additional American troops will be deployed to Afghanistan – despite the fact that the U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan expressly opposed troop escalation in two strongly worded cables sent to the White House in 2009.

    As shown in our latest video, Ambassador Eikenberry is a retired general who previously led the U.S. military effort in Afghanistan. In his cables, Eikenberry stated that “the proposed troop increase will bring vastly increased costs and an indefinite, large-scale U.S. military role in Afghanistan…in a mission that most agree cannot be won solely by military means.”

    The White House ignored Eikenberry’s warnings and sent troops anyway.

    Sign our Act.ly petition urging House Armed Services Committee Members to to read the Eikenberry cables.

    Today, House Armed Services Committee (HASC) members are meeting to begin writing a 2011 budget for the Afghanistan war. It’s absolutely essential that they read the Eikenberry memos before they authorize more troops and funds for a war that will cost the U.S. a fortune when we can least afford it and that is not making us safer.

    Let’s make sure HASC members hear Eikenberry’s warning before they compound the mistake of sending more troops into a bloody, expensive war in Afghanistan.

    Sincerely,

    Derrick Crowe
    Political Associate

    **************************************************************

    U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan, Karl Eikenberry.

    In November he contributed two reports to the Obama administration’s policy debate regarding the escalation, both of which argued against General McChrystal’s counterinsurgency strategy and questioned whether Afghan President Hamid Karzai could be counted a reliable partner:

    “Sending additional forces will delay the day when Afghans will take over, and make it difficult, if not impossible, to bring our people home on a reasonable timetable,” he wrote Nov. 6. “An increased U.S. and foreign role in security and governance will increase Afghan dependence, at least in the short-term.” [...]
    “Yet Karzai continues to shun responsibility for any sovereign burden, whether defense, governance or development. He and much of his circle do not want the U.S. to leave and are only too happy to see us invest further,” Mr. Eikenberry wrote. “They assume we covet their territory for a never-ending ‘war on terror’ and for military bases to use against surrounding powers.”

    Eikenberry feared that sending more U.S. troops to Afghanistan would only serve to make America “more deeply engaged here with no way to extricate ourselves, short of allowing the country to descend again into lawlessness and chaos.”

    He has since said that his concerns have been alleviated, but it is unclear how. (Read more about the reports HERE.)

    David Bromwich wrote of Eikenberry’s diplomatic cables:

    It is as if we had been offered a long look at several pages of the most disturbing prognosis in the Pentagon Papers; as if we could see the president reading them with us, and then deciding in spite of everything to go ahead with the war.

    For more on the significance of the Eikenberry cables, watch the Rethink Afghanistan video below



    • Share/Bookmark
    04 Feb

    Margaret and Helen, Elderly Liberals from Texas and Maine

    Margaret and Helen

    nargaret-and-helen

    Best Friends for Sixty Years and Counting… 

    My name is Helen Philpot. I am 82 years old.  My grandson taught me how to do this so that I could “blog” with my best friend Margaret Schmechtman who I met in college almost 60 years ago.  I have three children with my husband Harold.  Margaret has three dogs with her husband Howard.  I live in Texas and Margaret lives in Maine.

    Visit Margaret and Helen at Their Web Site

    The Elephant in the Room is a Kangaroo

     Margaret, I really do like this President.  He is young and smart… and I think he is trying his best under bad circumstances to do the right thing and create change for good.  Not easy these days… Sort of like  your convincing Howard that  seeing a doctor annually at his age is still preventative medicine.  You’ve both got a tough sales job ahead of you. 

    I really do appreciate his trying to reach across the aisle - as they say – and get Republicans to work towards bipartisanship.  But honey, that dog just don’t hunt.  Trying to reach bipartisanship with this particular Republican Party will probably achieve bipolarism instead of bipartisanship.

    Harsh?  Well yes maybe I am being a bit harsh.  Part of the problem?  Well maybe that too.  After all bipartisanship requires a little give and take from both sides.  So who am I to suggest that the problem is mainly with the Republicans?

    Good questions all of them – particularly because I was the one who asked them.  You know me, Margaret.  I’m always trying to play both sides of the same issue.   Well what do you expect from a woman who invented the all pie diet?

    To all my Republican readers out there – I have had quite enough of your nonsense. 

    Your party gave us Sarah Palin and George W. Bush – dumb and dumber.  He’s the guy whose mission still isn’t accomplished and she’s the gal who couldn’t handle being governor of one of our least populous states.  Even the “professional” wrestler was able to finish the job in Minnesota.

    Your party had an issue with President Obama telling school children to stay in school and study hard.  I guess a black man can’t be trusted with your children regardless of his credentials.    And your party decided the tradition of separating church and state had an expiration date.  You love the constitution but you seem to pick through that document the same way you pick through the Bible – with all the effectiveness of eating corn on the cob through a picket fence.

    We are actively involved in  two wars, but you  just can’t understand why the deficit is so big?   Regardless of what you have been told,  every time a bomb is dropped, an angel does not get her wings.  Hint:  Defense spending represents almost one quarter of all federal spending.

    Today’s Republican Party has an issue with abortion, but then fights against healthcare reform knowing full well that more than 9 million children lack health insurance.  A stretch argument to be sure, but then again 18 19 Children and Counting is a big hit. 

    My party at least recognizes the need for increased access to birth control.  Your party is pro-life right up until they cut the cord and then you turn your attention to electing judges who promote shortening the waiting time on death row.

    And for Pete’s sake your party has an issue with gay people, but you gladly send your straight children to war while telling gays they cannot serve.  This one, more than any other, has me scratching my head.  Aren’ t you just delaying their eventual trip to Hell? 

    You  actually have Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck as your spokesmen.   Rush Limbaugh?  Are you serious?  Even the NFL didn’t want Limbaugh.  And Beck… Glenn Beck?  When people use the expression ”nuttier than a fruitcake” Glenn Beck is the main ingredient.

    The Republican Party of yesteryear was respectable.  You were all about a small government that carried a big stick.  Now you are just despicable.  You used to be the Party of Lincoln and now – honest to God –  you make Archie Bunker look progressive. 

    If it wasn’t for Fox News you would be irrelevent.  That’s right.  You have become a party that owes its entire existence to a cable news channel owned by an Aussie.  Your mascot should be a kangaroo instead of an elephant.  After all, the last guy you sent to the White House arrived there thanks to a kangaroo court ruling rather than an election.   He then spent the next 8 years bringing our nation to its knees.   How about sitting down and shutting your damn pie holes long enough to see if the guy in office now can actually clean up your mess.  Honestly, you are embarrassing yourself. 

    Look.  My party has problems too.  It’s biggest problem might be in attempting to please everyone, the Democratic Party seems to please no one.  But diversity of opinions is something I am willing to work through.  Bigotry and ignorance is not.  I mean it.  Really.

     

    • Share/Bookmark
    04 Feb

    On the claimed “war exception” to the Constitution

    Salon.com | On the claimed “war exception” to the Constitution

    An Obama official acknowledges the targeting of American citizens for assassination — with no judicial oversight

    By Glenn Greenwald, Feb. 04, 2010

    Last week, I wrote about a revelation buried in a Washington Post article by Dana Priest which described how the Obama administration has adopted the Bush policy of targeting selected American citizens for assassination if they are deemed (by the Executive Branch) to be Terrorists.  As The Washington Times‘ Eli Lake reports, Adm. Dennis Blair was asked about this program at a Congressional hearing yesterday and he acknowledged its existence:

    The U.S. intelligence community policy on killing American citizens who have joined al Qaeda requires first obtaining high-level government approval, a senior official disclosed to Congress on Wednesday.

    Director of National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair said in each case a decision to use lethal force against a U.S. citizen must get special permission. . . .

    He also said there are criteria that must be met to authorize the killing of a U.S. citizen that include “whether that American is involved in a group that is trying to attack us, whether that American is a threat to other Americans. Those are the factors involved.”

    Although Blair emphasized that it requires “special permission” before an American citizen can be placed on the assassination list, consider from whom that “permission” is obtained:  the President, or someone else under his authority within the Executive Branch.  There are no outside checks or limits at all on how these “factors” are weighed.  In last week’s post, I wrote about all the reasons why it’s so dangerous — as well as both legally and Consitutionally dubious — to allow the President to kill American citizens not on an active battlefield during combat, but while they are sleeping, sitting with their families in their home, walking on the street, etc.  That’s basically giving the President the power to impose death sentences on his own citizens without any charges or trial.  Who could possibly support that?

    But even if you’re someone who does want the President to have the power to order American citizens killed without a trial by decreeing that they are Terrorists (and it’s worth remembering that if you advocate that power, it’s going to be vested in all Presidents, not just the ones who are as Nice, Good, Kind-Hearted and Trustworthy as Barack Obama), shouldn’t there at least be some judicial approval required?  Do we really want the President to be able to make this decision unilaterally and without outside checks?  Remember when many Democrats were horrified (or at least when they purported to be) at the idea that Bush was merely eavesdropping on American citizens without judicial approval?  Shouldn’t we be at least as concerned about the President’s being able to assassinate Americans without judicial oversight?  That seems much more Draconian to me.

    Click to continue reading “On the claimed “war exception” to the Constitution”

    • Share/Bookmark
    04 Feb

    CIA Video Of U.S. Missionaries’ Plane Being Shot Down In Peru (VIDEO)

    The mother, Veronica Bowers, and her infant daughter were killed by bullets fired at the plane.

    Huffington Post |  Nicholas Sabloff First Posted: 02- 4-10 09:26 AM   |   Updated: 02- 4-10 11:54 AM

    ABC News has obtained some incredibly dramatic footage [scroll down for video] of an incident from nine years ago in which the CIA watched as a Peruvian air force fighter jets shot down a plane carrying American missionaries even as the pilot screamed for help.

    The tape was shot from a CIA plane which was on assignment in Peru as part of anti-smuggling operations undertaken in coordination with the Peruvian air force. As ABC’s Brian Ross notes, it has taken this long for the CIA to acknowledge its responsibility in the matter.

    Traveling in the plane, which was mistakenly believed to be carrying drug smugglers, was a family of Christian missionaries from Michigan, the Bowers. The mother, Veronica Bowers, and her infant daughter were killed by bullets fired at the plane. Her husband and six-year-old son, as well as the pilot, survived. The family was flying back from a trip to Brazil.

    What’s perhaps most chilling about the video is that the CIA pilots clearly doubt that the plane is actually being used for drug smuggling, but are unable to communicate this to the Peruvian air force in time to stop an attack. “I don’t know if this is bandito or amigo,” one of the CIA pilots says. “This guy doesn’t fit the profile.” Later on, not long before the plane is shot down, one of the CIA pilots mutters. “I think we’re making a mistake.” They warn the Peruvian pilots not to shoot the plane down, but their warnings don’t seem to be understood due to a language barrier.

    In 2008, CIA inspector general John Helgerson accused his agency of trying to cover up the incident, the New York Times reported:

    An internal investigation by the Central Intelligence Agency has found that the agency withheld crucial information from federal investigators who spent years trying to determine whether C.I.A. officers committed crimes related to the accidental downing of a missionary plane in Peru in 2001.

    On Wednesday the CIA said its investigation had concluded that 16 of its employees should be disciplined, though many of them are no longer with the agency. In a statement to ABC News, a CIA spokesperson laid the blame for the tragedy on the Peruvian Air Force.

    Rep. Pete Hoekstra of Michigan, who has campaigned on behalf of the Bowers family, insisted that justice had still been denied.

    “These were Americans that were killed with the help of their government, the community covered it up, they delayed investigating,” Hoekstra said.

    • Share/Bookmark
    05 Feb

    Events of Interest

    GOP Senator Shelby Blocks ALL Obama Nominations Over Alabama Earmarks

    Sen. Richard Shelby’s (R-Ala.) decision to place a “blanket hold” on all presidential nominations until a pair of billion-dollar earmarks for his home state are fast-tracked has reignited the debate over the parliamentary tactics being deployed by the Republican Party. It also has thrust into the spotlight the clout that major defense contractors often yield on the political process.

    On Thursday evening, news broke that the Alabama Republican has taken the extraordinary measure of holding up at least 70 “nominations on the Senate calendar” — essentially threatening to filibuster the confirmation processes if they came to a vote. The move has spurred a series of recriminations from Democratic officials who see it as yet another instance of over-the-top obstructionism of the president’s agenda.

    It also has turned inquisitive eyes towards Shelby himself.**************************

    Shelby

    White House Outraged .. Earmarks Turn Spotlight On Shelby’s Defense Contractor Ties

    Sarah Palin, the former vice presidential candidate, will address Tea Party supporters tomorrow

    Tea Party movement reaches boiling point at first convention hits trouble

    Sarah Palin’s $100,000 speaking fee angers right-wing rank and file

    Obama angers Beijing by agreeing to meet Dalai Lama

    The prospect of a full-blown diplomatic spat between China and the US moved closer yesterday when the White House revealed that the Dalai Lama will be invited to meet Barack Obama during his visit to the US this month.

    US missionaries to stand trial for kidnap

    Ten members of a US missionary group who said they were trying to rescue 33 child victims of Haiti’s earthquake were charged with child kidnapping and criminal association yesterday.

    The treatment of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab has been criticised on Capitol Hill

    Christmas Day bomber breaks silence after visit from family

    FBI is ‘following up on new information’ gleaned from Nigerian student

    Pakistani scientist guilty of trying to kill US agents

    An American-trained Pakistani scientist has been found guilty of attempting to murder US agents while she was detained for questioning in Afghanistan.

    Mark Kirk has a reputation as an independent thinker

    Could Obama’s old seat go to a Republican?

    Democrats take nothing for granted after moderate wins Illinois primary

    The Iranian parliamentary speaker Ali Larijani led condemnation of US

    Iran ‘will comply over uranium processing’

    David Usborne: Tehran accuses US of stirring up Iran-phobia – then Ahmadinejad signals compromise

    Spanish premier Jose-Luis Zapatero, left, and Herman van Rompuy

    Who’s Obama going to call when he wants to talk to Europe?

    Row over EU summit venue highlights confusion at heart of institution




    • Share/Bookmark
    05 Feb

    An Alabama Republican is holding the Nation hostage.


    CREDO Action | more than a network. a movement.


    An Alabama Republican is holding Democrats hostage.

    Enough is enough.

    Your message to Harry Reid:

    Enough is enough. Do not honor Sen. Shelby’s shameful hold on all 70 of Pres. Obama’s appointees. Stand up, fight back and make the Republicans filibuster these nominees and suffer the consequences in the court of public opinion.

    Clicking here will add your name to the petition.

    Dear Richard,

    A Republican Senator from Alabama has put what is by all accounts an extraordinary “blanket hold” on almost every single nomination that President Obama has sent to the Senate.

    This is what happens when the Democratic leadership plays nice with bullies. The country loses. And if Sen. Richard Shelby is successful, this kind of extortion will only get worse.

    At least 70 nominees to important positions at the White House, the federal judiciary, and crucial cabinet agencies — including those charged with keeping us safe from terrorism — cannot move forward until this hold is ignored or lifted.

    Click here to automatically sign the petition telling Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid: Enough is enough! Make the Republicans filibuster.

    What’s worse, this is not just the typical Republican obstructionism, but a brazen brand of political extortion. According to reports, Sen. Shelby will lift his hold on the President’s executive appointees if the Senate agrees to pour billions of dollars into Alabama via two federal programs:
    — A $40 billion contract for Northrop/Airbus to build air-to-air refueling tankers in Mobile, Ala.
    — The construction of a $45 million FBI lab outside Huntsville, Ala.

    It’s time for Democratic leadership to stand up to Republicans, starting with Sen. Shelby. Senate Majority Leader Reid should refuse to honor Shelby’s “blanket hold” on more than 70 nominees. If Republicans want to block every single Obama appointee, they must filibuster them one-by-one and deal with the very public consequences of their obstructionism. Sen. Shelby should be ashamed — but he is not.

    Harry Reid has refused to honor holds in the past — including when Sen. Chris Dodd tried to block retroactive telecom immunity for big telecom companies who helped the Bush White House spy on Americans.

    Imagine the gall of blocking every single one of the President’s appointees, just to bring home pork to the state of Alabama.

    If ever there was a time for Sen. Reid to say enough is enough, it’s now. We can’t let Senate Democrats simply stand by while a Republican Senator brazenly takes advantage of their spinelessness to extort billions of taxpayer dollars for boondoggle projects in his home state.

    Click here to automatically sign the petition telling Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid: Sen. Shelby’s blanket hold on all of President Obama’s nominees is nothing more than extortion — fight back and make the Republicans filibuster and suffer the consequences in the court of public opinion.

    Thank you for demanding action from Democratic leadership.

    Becky Bond, Political Director
    CREDO Action from Working Assets





    • Share/Bookmark
    06 Feb

    Events of Interest

    US denies Iran nuclear deal ‘close’

    Defence secretary dismisses Iran’s claims uranium swap could be agreed in near future.
    A nuclear war of words
    Iran and the US
    Nuclear double standard
    Timeline: Iran’s nuclear programme
    Washington area shut down by heavy snow, while flooding leads to deaths in Mexico.
    Thousands of people attend funerals after attacks on Shia Muslims in Pakistani city.

    ***************************************************

    Afghan police ‘kill civilians’
    Deaths reported in Yemen clashes
    Clinton urges speed in Haiti case
    Nigeria’s Anambra state vote begins
    N Korea frees US religious activist
    Ukraine rivals end campaigning

    *************************************************

    02/05/10 AP: Death Toll In Iraq Attack Rises To 40

    At least 40 people have died in the latest attack on Shiite pilgrims in Iraq. More than 150 others were wounded when twin car bombs tore through a crowd walking to the holy city of Karbala (KAHR’-bah-lah) for a major religious observance.

    02/05/10 Reuters: Two car bombs kill at least 40 people, wound 145 in Kerbala,

    Two car bombs killed at least 40 people and wounded 145 others in Kerbala, 80 km (50 miles) southwest of Baghdad, health officials said.

    02/05/10 Reuters: Roadside bomb kills one pilgrim, wounds 13 others in eastern Baghdad

    A roadside bomb struck a bus carrying pilgrims, killing one and wounding 13 others in eastern Baghdad, police said.

    02/05/10 Reuters: Sniper wound pilgrim in eastern Baghdad

    A sniper wounded one pilgrim in Zayouna district of eastern Baghdad, a Baghdad security spokesman said.

    02/05/10 Reuters: Body of kidnap victim found in western Mosul

    Police found the body of a kidnapping victim riddled with bullets in western Mosul, 390 km (240 miles) north of Baghdad, police said

    02/05/10 Reuters: Roadside bomb wounds Iraqi soldier in western Mosul

    A roadside bomb wounded one Iraqi soldier on foot patrol in western Mosul, police said.

    02/05/10 Reuters: Gunmen kill two policemen in an attack south of Mosul,

    Unknown gunmen killed two policemen in an attack on a checkpoint south of Mosul, police said.

    02/05/10 AP: Car bomb kills 27 Shiite pilgrims

    A suicide attacker detonated a car bomb Friday alongside a crowd of Shiite pilgrims walking to a holy city south of Baghdad, killing at least 27 people and wounding 60, Iraqi police officials said.

    • Share/Bookmark
    06 Feb

    WINTER OF AMERICA’S DISCONTENT

     Voters Fed Up With Both Parties

    _47254327_008686890-1

    Voters Fed Up With Both Parties

    Timothy Rutten, LA Times

    It has been more than four decades since the Congress of the United States has been able to summon the will to pass a major piece of social legislation. Not since 1965, when Medicare and the Voting Rights Act both overcame decades of opposition to become law, has Congress proved itself up to the task.

    Significant healthcare reform is all but dead for this session, and the chances of substantively addressing the regulatory breakdown that allowed Wall Street’s irresponsible speculation to precipitate the worst global financial crisis since the Depression seem to recede with each passing day. So too the prospects for passage of further stimulus measures to remedy the crisis of unemployment and underemployment that continues to ravage the lives of families in states from Michigan to California.

    In the face of these daunting issues, what was it that preoccupied the Senate on the eve of its long weekend recess? The legislative drama du jour is the standoff between the White House and Sen. Richard C. Shelby (R-Ala.), who has put a personal hold on more than 70 executive branch appointments until the Obama administration agrees to fund a couple of pork-barrel projects he has earmarked for his state. One involves tens of millions of dollars for an FBI laboratory focusing on improvised explosives — something the bureau doesn’t think it needs. The other involves contract specifications for an aerial tanker that Northrop Grumman and Airbus would manufacture in Alabama, if they win the deal. (Boeing also is competing for the plane, which it would build in Topeka, Kan., and Seattle.)

    Click to continue reading “WINTER OF AMERICA’S DISCONTENT”

    • Share/Bookmark

    © 2010 themcglynn.com/theliberal.net | Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)

    Global Positioning System Gazettewordpress logo
    WordPress Loves AJAX