Thomas Paine's version of "you didn't build that":
"Separate an individual from society,and give him an island or a continent to possess,and he cannot acquire personal property. He cannot be rich. So inseparably are the means connected with the end,in all cases,that where the former do not exist the latter cannot be obtained. All accumulation, therefore,of personal property,beyond what a man's own hands produce, is derived to him by living in society; and he owes on every principle of justice,of gratitude,and of civilization,a part of that accumulation back again to society from whence the whole came"
Submitted by Leah
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here:
Cookie Policy
Nearly all of these are English-edition daily newspapers. These sites have interesting editorials and essays, and many have links to other good news sources. We try to limit this list to those sites which are regularly updated, reliable, with a high percentage of “up” time.
2019 Whitley Award winners. Photograph: James Finlay/Whitley Awards 2019
On May 1, Princess Anne, patron of the Whitley Fund for Nature, presented the fund’s awards recognising community-based conservation projects. See more at whitleyaward.org
Ilena Zanella
Ilena Zanella from Costa Rica is the co-founder of marine conservation organisation Misión Tiburón, which protects scalloped hammerhead sharks from illegal fishing. Her work is based in the Golfo Dulce, one of only four tropical fjords in the world.
.
Photograph: 2019 Whitley Gold Award
After nine years of research and tagging, Zanella proved the Golfo Dulce is a nursery habitat for young scalloped hammerhead sharks. The site was declared Costa Rica’s first shark sanctuary in 2018, protecting the species from illegal fishing.
With her Whitley Award, Zanella says she will improve detection of illegal fishing and work with local communities to reduce the use of juvenile scalloped hammerheads as fishing bait. She also plans to establish an education project to engage students in conservation.
Photograph: David Garcia/2019 Whitley Gold Award
Wendi Tamariska
Wendi Tamariska is the sustainable livelihoods manager for the Gunung Palung Orangutan Conservation Programme in Borneo, Inonesia, which empowers local communities to protect their dwindling forests and the orangutans within them. The Gunung Palung national park is home to the largest population of wild orangutans on the planet.
Photograph: 2019 Whitley Award
Gulung Palung national park is home to 5,000 critically endangered Bornean orangutans and other endangered species including hornbills, pangolins and Malayan sun bears. The 100,000-hectare protected area is threatened by illegal logging, mining and oil palm plantations. In the last 60 years, orangutan populations have declined by over 50% and they could be wiped out in just 20 years if action isn’t taken.
Photograph: Tim Laman/2019 Whitley Award
Illegal mining and logging have disrupted the orangutans’ habitat, as local people were offered incentives for exploiting the forest’s raw materials. Tamariska’s organisation works to reinstate traditional weaving practices and provides local, national and international markets for the sale of woven items. As an indigenous Dayak himself, Tamariska has built a strong rapport with local people.
In London thousands of demonstrators have staged a sit down protest outside the department of education. The students are demanding that the climate and ecological crisis are taught as part of the wider curriculum. Daze Aghaji, one of the leaders of the school strike movement who stood on a climate emergency ticket in the European elections said: “This is amazing, the turnout today is great and it proves the youth is rising and things are about to change.”
The school strike movement in the UK is supporting a Green New Deal to see the rapid transformation to a decarbonised economy, creating hundreds of thousands of well paid unionised jobs.
Mia, 13, from south London was one of four youngsters holding a huge banner reading Green New Deal Now. “We need to stop talking about Brexit and start talking about stuff that really matters – like the climate and the Green New Deal. Look how many young people are here. We are in politics, this is our fight.”
Libby Brooks
As school strikers poured into George Square around lunchtime following a march from Glasgow Green, organiser Nancy Baijonauth, 16, declared the protest the biggest yet in the city since the protests began. “It’s really great. It felt like at the start people were hesitant, maybe because they felt nervous and that they couldn’t make a change, but now more people are joining in.”
While she welcomed the Scottish government declaring a climate emergency, she said that this was only the first step. “We can’t pat ourselves on the back, we have to keep moving,” she said. The protests would keep going, she added, but there needed to be more education, with activists going into schools to talk to pupils directly.
Fraser Haughey, 8, briefly took the microphone at the front of the rally to declare that “all children have the right to a future”. Fraser had come to the protest with his mother and sister, from Cambuslang, south-east of Glasgow, and said that he hoped politicians would pay attention to the children’s voices.
Madeleine Carlin, 13, was attending with her mother and two-year-old brother, as well as school friends from St Andrews high school in Coatbridge, east of the city, and said that she was attending “because we’ve only got 12 years until the damage is irreversible”.
“Our message is that we need to stop ignoring this. It’s our generation and the one after that who will have to deal with the consequences.”
It’s also worth pointing out to adults concerned about pupils missing school that many schools in Glasgow and surrounding suburbs have an in-service day today because of the bank holiday, while senior four to six pupils are still at the tail end of their study leave.
Theresa May announces her resignation in Downing Street on Friday. Photograph: Yui Mok/PA
Back in 2016, we gave the British people a choice. Against all predictions, the British people voted to leave the European Union. I feel as certain today as I did three years ago that in a democracy, if you give people a choice you have a duty to implement what they decide.
This is a familiar line from Theresa May, whose lineage can be traced right back to the “Brexit means Brexit” catchphrase of her first few months in office. But she does genuinely believe not only that the result of the Brexit referendum must be implemented – but that failing to do so is dangerous for Britain’s democracy.
I believe it was right to persevere, even when the odds against success seemed high. But it is now clear to me that it is in the best interests of the country for a new prime minister to lead that effort.
This is a sideswipe at the colleagues who have been trying to bring her down for months, and were driven to fresh spasms of fury when she entered talks with Jeremy Corbyn, in a bid to win Labour support for a modified version of her Brexit deal.
Her efforts ultimately failed – but she’s saying she stands by the decision that it was the right decision to keep on trying, right up until the end.
It is, and will always remain, a matter of deep regret to me that I have not been able to deliver Brexit.
May knows that whatever she hoped would be her achievements, her three-year tenure in Downing Street is likely to be remembered chiefly for her failure to achieve the central task her government was set by the electorate.
She’s signalling here that she knows this failure is a burden she will carry for the rest of her life.
It will be for my successor to seek a way forward that honours the result of the referendum. To succeed, he or she will have to find consensus in parliament where I have not. Such a consensus can only be reached if those on all sides of the debate are willing to compromise.
This is the “good luck with that, Boris” passage. May has ultimately been brought down by those in her own party seeking a cleaner break with the European Union, which they believe the obligations contained in the Irish backstop will prevent.
But whoever succeeds her will have to govern with the support of a hung parliament, unless and until they call a general election. So a harder Brexit, let alone no deal, is highly unlikely to command a majority in parliament.
May is pointing out here that whoever is behind the big black door in Downing Street, the structural challenges of delivering Brexit remain – and they may become more, not less difficult, if her successor is more dogmatic.
Security. Freedom. Opportunity. Those values have guided me throughout my career. But the unique privilege of this office is to use this platform to give a voice to the voiceless, to fight the burning injustices that still scar our society.
This was followed by a list of the achievements May most prizes, and was an attempt to impose some coherence on a premiership defined almost exclusively by Brexit.
But two of the things she mentioned, the public inquiry into the Grenfell Tower disaster, and the race disparity audit, are efforts to investigate why things have gone badly wrong, in a Britain her party has run for almost nine years.
Another, ending the postcode lottery in mental health, appears more of an aspiration than a success.
I will shortly leave the job that it has been the honour of my life to hold – the second female prime minister but certainly not the last. I do so with no ill-will, but with enormous and enduring gratitude to have had the opportunity to serve the country I love.
This was the moment May’s usually steely demeanour collapsed, her voice cracking with emotion as she uttered those last few words.
She may have been more low-key about it than the flamboyant Johnson, but she has long been a deeply ambitious and self-confident politician, who believed she was the right person for Britain’s top job – and now it’s over.
Robert Mueller wants to testify – but behind closed doors
House judiciary committee Chairman Jerry Nadler told Rachel Maddow in an MSNBC interview last night that Robert Mueller “wants to testify in private” on Capitol Hill, not in a public hearing, about his investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential campaign and all the allegations of collusion and obstruction of justice.
Nadler said he didn’t know why Mueller was so keen only to talk to Congress off camera, but mused that the special counsel wants to avoid the “political spectacle” that’s engulfed matter since the release of his report last month.
“He envisions himself, correctly, as a man of great rectitude, and apolitical, and he doesn’t want to participate in anything he might regard as a political spectacle.”
Nadler said a transcript of the testimony would be issued afterwards.
“We want him to come in and testify, we want others to come in and testify,” he said. “There are a lot of people who should come in and testify who the administration is saying they will not permit to testify…We think it’s important for the American people to hear from him and to hear his answers to questions about the report,” he said.
This entry was posted
on Friday, May 24th, 2019 at 9:45 am and is filed under General.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.