Thomas Paine's version of "you didn't build that":
"Separate an individual from society,and give him an island or a continent to possess,and he cannot acquire personal property. He cannot be rich. So inseparably are the means connected with the end,in all cases,that where the former do not exist the latter cannot be obtained. All accumulation, therefore,of personal property,beyond what a man's own hands produce, is derived to him by living in society; and he owes on every principle of justice,of gratitude,and of civilization,a part of that accumulation back again to society from whence the whole came"
Submitted by Leah
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here:
Cookie Policy
Nearly all of these are English-edition daily newspapers. These sites have interesting editorials and essays, and many have links to other good news sources. We try to limit this list to those sites which are regularly updated, reliable, with a high percentage of “up” time.
Today is Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement for Jewish people. It is 45 years since the war which bore its name.
That was the last of three assaults launched by surrounding Arab powers to eradicate Israel.
The previous one, in 1967, ended when Israel drove Jordan out of the West Bank, Egypt out of Gaza and Sinai, and Syria from the Golan Heights.
In light of this weekend’s visit by the President of the Palestinian National Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, this is context to be remembered.
Understandably there is focus on the need for Israel to leave the West Bank.
The eastern boundary of the Jewish state is intensely fraught. The plight of Palestinians in Gaza is correctly an international concern. What signifies debate in Ireland is neither focus on the West Bank nor Gaza, however, but annexation of nearly all context from the debate.
That narrow focus on undeniable plight and an accompanying, relentless emphasis on Israel alone leaves no room for remembering or examining causes.
In three wars, Israel defended itself against mass attack. Let me be clear. I wish Israel out of the West Bank, but finding a way out, if there is one, requires remembering how it arrived.
I welcome President Abbas to Ireland. Our Government’s policy is about right. We need relations with both sides to access and influence either. We are not main players but we are part of the EU.
We have valuable economic relations with Israel and a significant stake through the Irish Army’s presence with Unifil in Lebanon. The attempt, sometimes difficult, to pursue a positive agenda with both sides is under sustained attack now by an ultra anti-Israel lobby in Ireland.
Its hallmark is vitriolic, one-sided attack on an “oppressor” and demonisation of Israel in ways that echo and worryingly perpetuate anti-Semitism. This isn’t Jeremy Corbyn’s Britain.
But unfettered focus on one side, the blanking of even recent history from current context and a feral demonisation of one people only, is the underbelly of a fixated sort of anti-imperialism that is as amoral in its attitude to collateral damage, including truth, as the powers it claims to be the polar opposite of.
What remains real is the plight of Palestinians. Their situation is nearly hopeless — partly that is because they are leaderless.
If current boundaries were shaped by the consequences of outright attack on Israel, there have been attempts at peace. One was partly successful. The 1979 accord with Egypt brought bilateral peace and returned Sinai.
Tellingly the Egyptians demurred at reasserting authority over Gaza. Eventual Israeli evacuation in 2005 is seen by some Israelis as a mistake, which brought no peace, but forfeited effective control. I don’t agree, but it is part of a hardening sense that land for peace is fool’s gold.
Fundamentally there is no real Palestinian acceptance of the right of Israel to exist. Essential to this is refusal across an otherwise violently divided Palestinian polity to abandon the right of return.
That means 5m Palestinians settling within Israel’s pre-1967 borders, mostly generations after they left. By another name, “the right of return” is a war of return for the outright destruction of Israel. It is Palestinian policy. It is Abbas’ policy.
It was what Hamas in Gaza drove its march to the wall for, and whether out of weakness or principle, ideological ground staked out by Hamas is political turf Abbas cannot or will not abandon.
It is this issue, more than any other, which ensured the Oslo Accords remained unfulfilled hope. Yitzhak Rabin paid for peace with his life. Yasser Arafat died in his bed, but not before he resiled from potential peace at Camp David in 2000.
Plenty of sunshine is needed to bring out the intense reds and yellows from the leaves, and this year we’re set for a dazzling display
Prof Alistair Griffiths
Autumn colour in the trees near Grasmere in the Lake District, Cumbria. Photograph: Owen Humphreys/PA
Autumn colour is perhaps the most striking of nature’s seasonal displays, but the vividness of the annual spectacle is largely dependent on good environmental conditions. This year, following a fine summer and with an Indian summer predicted, we look to be on course for a dazzling display that could trump recent years and extend well into November.
Shorter daylight hours and colder nights are what trigger leaf drop – or senescence – but frost, like rain, can damage leaves and cause early leaf fall. Plenty of sunshine is needed to encourage concentrations of colour pigments which help to intensify leaf colour.
2018’s cold spring and hot summer will have helped ready the leaves for a beautiful autumn display, but it also hinges on what the weather does now. If it cools and we get cold nights, that will contribute to good leaf colour.
Autumn bulbs have also had a good baking in the sun and are giving a fine display this year. The cold spring also held back flowering which means fruit has set, so many hedges are looking colourful with berries.
The long hot summer has also resulted in a “fake fall”, where plants such as elderberries yellow and drop because of extreme summer stress. But we’re unlikely to see a real flurry of colour before mid to late October, although the impact of climate change means it has happened later in recent years.
The process of plants transitioning into shades of reds, yellows and oranges is hotly anticipated by gardeners and dedicated “leaf peepers” around the world. It’s said to be worth a staggering $1bn to the US state of Wisconsin alone.
It might seem counterintuitive that while we prepare to reacquaint with jumpers, gloves and woolly hats, trees are preparing to shed this year’s leaves, something known as leaf senescence.
Here’s why.
Leaf senescence is an “altruistic death” allowing the degradation and redistribution of nutrients produced during growth back to other parts of the plant. This strategy evolved to maximise the fitness and survival of the plant. Leaf senescence is highly complex, involving multiple genes and numerous biological, chemical and physical processes.
And at the heart of it all is a pigment called chlorophyll. Chlorophyll is what gives leaves their green colour, absorbing and reflecting different hues from the colour light spectrum, as seen in a rainbow. In leaves it absorbs mainly red and blue light, reflecting green, and it is this reflection that makes leaves appear green to the human eye.
But as well as providing a lustrous green sheen, chlorophyll is also an essential component of photosynthesis, which is arguably the single most important chemical process on our planet. Using energy from sunlight, chlorophyll strips electrons from water molecules, which then convert carbon dioxide into carbon compounds and produce oxygen, which is essential for life on earth.
In autumn, chlorophyll, mainly in deciduous plants, is slowly broken down and reabsorbed by the plant, diminishing the green colour of the leaves. It is this reabsorption that ensures they spring back to life the following year.
As chlorophyll is broken down, pigments called carotenoids and flavonoids are revealed and it is these, again, through the absorption and reflection of different colours from the light spectrum, that are responsible for the yellow and orange hues of leaves. Sugar concentration in the leaves also increases anthocyanin production, which causes some leaves to turn a shade of red.
Loch Lomund in Scotland. This year’s display will depend on the coming weather. Photograph: Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images for Red Bull
Sweet gum and acers can almost always be relied upon for good colour but some trees, including alders, show little change. What tends to make the difference in gardens is the reaction of our more proliferate native trees, such as oak, and whether they take on stronger yellows or more placid browns.
Suspicion was aroused when a number of precincts suddenly delivered 100% of their votes to the acting governor, Andrei Tarasenko. Photograph: Yuri Maltsev/Reuters
Russian election officials have called for the result of a gubernatorial ballot in the country’s far east to be annulled because of widespread voter fraud, in the first decision of its kind in more than a decade.
Voters in the Primorsky Krai region looked set on Sunday to reject an incumbent governor from the ruling United Russia party, led by allies of Vladimir Putin. A groundswell of support for a Communist party challenger had followed plans to raise the pension age by five years for both men and women, delaying retirement for millions.
But in a suspicious last-minute shift a number of precincts suddenly delivered 100% of their votes to the acting governor, Andrei Tarasenko, handing him a victory that appeared moments earlier to be mathematically impossible.
The suspicious results prompted protests and a short-lived hunger strike by the challenger, Andrei Ishenko, who claimed the election had been stolen.
The extraordinary call to annul the result shows the degree to which the Kremlin, which is sensitive to public opinion and the possibility for protest, must balance supporting its political allies and assuaging public anger. While Russians still largely say they support Putin, close to half say they are also willing to protest against the loss of social benefits.
Under pressure to review the vote, Russia’s elections commissioner, Ella Pamfilova, said on Wednesday that violations at a number of polling stations by both sides meant that a rerun should be held. The final decision would rest with local election officials, who meet on Thursday.
If the results are thrown out and the election held again, it would mark the first decision of its kind in more than 15 years.
Pamfilova, a former human rights ombudsman, was installed by the Kremlin in 2016 to increase trust. More than 100,000 Russians came out to protest in Moscow in 2011 over the results from parliamentary elections marred by accusations of voter fraud.
The Kremlin on Wednesday backed Pamfilova’s remarks. Putin’s spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, said : “The legitimacy, purity, transparency, and fairness of elections is more important to [Putin] than the candidate he supports.”
Tarasenko said on Wednesday he would not run in new elections. Communist officials have said they would prefer the elections be recounted, rather than held again. New elections may be held in three months’ time.
Theresa May leaving Downing Street this morning. Photograph: Jack Taylor/Getty Images
People’s Vote claim there are ‘six plausible scenarios’ which could lead to MPs voting for second referendum
People’s Vote, which is campaigning for a referendum on the final Brexit deal, has published a 29-page paper today (pdf) setting out a “roadmap to a People’s Vote”. The conventional wisdom at Westminster is that, although a second referendum is not totally inconceivable, the practical obstacles are so formidable as to make the chances of it actually happening very slim. This is important because, if people assume that an idea is a non-starter (just as if people assume a political party has no chance of winning), then mobilising support for it is hard.
The document has been written by Lord Kerr, the diplomat credited with drafting article 50 in the first place, and the list of people who have submitted advice reads like a Who’s Who of Britain’s constitutional experts. It’s a serious document, summarised here.
Essentially the document makes two main arguments.
It says the UK would easily be able to suspend article 50 (the process underway leading to the UK leaving the EU on 29 March 2019). The EU’s own legal experts have said so, it says. And it says EU leaders would be happy to see the article 50 process to be extended to allow time for a referendum, if it could not be held before the end of March.
The People’s Vote campaign is in regular contact with politicians and officials from across Brussels and key European capitals. In our conversations it has been made clear repeatedly that there would be no difficulty about obtaining an extension for a defined period sufficient to permit consulting the people in a democratic vote. Should the UK need to request such an extension to allow for a public consultation to approve a deal, we are confident it would be granted. Therefore, it is our clear conclusion that there is no obstacle either in the politics or the procedure of Brexit to the UK delaying the March 29th 2019 deadline if this delay was judged necessary by Parliament in order to consult the people in a democratic vote.
It claims there are “at least six plausible scenarios” under which parliament could end up voting for another referendum. It says:
First, MPs could amend the motion put forward by the government if/when it presents its deal to parliament. The vote on this motion is expected to take place shortly after agreement has been reached with the EU. An amendment from the opposition, Conservative backbenchers or cross-party (if allowed by the speaker) could require that the deal be subject to a People’s Vote.
Second, in the event of that motion being rejected by parliament, or there being no final deal between the UK and EU by January 21st 2019, the government is committed to tabling a statement on how it intends to proceed. Parliament will have an opportunity to vote on this in the form of a motion. It will be for the speaker to determine whether or not that motion is in “neutral terms” and therefore whether it is amendable. Should it be determined that it is not in neutral terms then a People’s Vote amendment could be proposed and voted on.
Third, if the government’s motion on the deal has passed, the government will have to legislate for its implementation through an Act of Parliament. This European Union (withdrawal agreement) bill would be subject to amendments throughout its passage through Parliament, meaning an amendment could be passed that would make the bill conditional on approval of a People’s Vote.
Fourth, the prime minister could decide that with the Labour party and many Conservative MPs threatening to vote down her deal, the only way to secure a mandate for it is to put it to the public through a People’s Vote. She may choose to do this proactively or reactively after her deal has been rejected by the House of Commons.
Fifth, it also possible that having failed to secure a deal with the EU, the prime minister decides to put to the people the decision over whether the UK should leave the EU with no deal. Such a decision would be a last resort and would likely come late in the article 50 process, following failed attempts to force a change of position from the EU.
Sixth, a people’s vote could be legislated for following a snap general election. This outcome today seems very unlikely, but it is not inconceivable. The most plausible route to an election would be for the prime minister to seek one, and to secure the necessary two-thirds majority in the House of Commons. Any other routes to an election would require Conservative and/or Democratic Unionist party MPs to vote to bring down the government and are therefore extremely unlikely.
There is quite a lot to say about the strengths and weaknesses of this argument. I will post more on it soon.
Donald Trump has praised the Hurricane Florence relief efforts in a video posted to his Twitter account. The US president said it was a ‘tough hurricane’ and ‘one of the wettest we’ve ever seen, from the standpoint of water’
This entry was posted
on Wednesday, September 19th, 2018 at 1:14 pm and is filed under General.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.