22 Nov

Technique widely denounced as torture is ‘peanuts compared with what they are doing to us’, says real estate mogul as he does not rule out independent run
Donald Trump speaks in Birmingham, Alabama. Photograph: AL.COM /Landov / Barcroft Media
Donald Trump and Ben Carson, the two enduring frontrunners in the race to become the Republican party’s presidential candidate, have both indicated they would bring back waterboarding and other forms of “enhanced interrogation” that were dropped by the US government, having widely been denounced as a form of torture.
In the latest ratcheting-up of rhetoric in the fallout from the Paris terror attacks, Trump told ABC News on Sunday he would “absolutely bring back” waterboarding in the fight against Islamic State militants.
“They don’t use waterboarding over there,” he said, “they use chopping off people’s heads, they use drowning people – they put people in cages and drown them in the ocean then lift out the cage.”
The real estate billionaire added that he thought waterboarding was “peanuts compared with what they are doing to us – what they did with [US journalist and Isis hostage] James Foley when they chopped off his head.”
Later in the same ABC show, Carson, a former neurosurgeon, was asked if he would support Trump’s call to bring back the controversial interrogation technique. He said: “I agree that there’s no such thing as political correctness when you are fighting an enemy who wants to destroy you.”
The significance of the remarks from Trump and Carson within the conservative debate following the Paris attacks that killed 130 people was underlined by a new Washington Post-ABC News poll that had the two outsiders holding tight to their commanding national lead over all other Republican presidential candidates.
In a finding virtually unchanged over the previous month, Trump was on 32% support among registered Republicans and Carson on 22%. They were followed by the only other contender on double figures, the Florida senator Marco Rubio, on 11%.
Even more pointedly, Trump had a massive lead when those who leaned Republican were asked whom they trusted to deal with the threat of terrorism. He garnered a 40% trust rating. The next leading candidate, former Florida governor Jeb Bush, was on 18%…………………


Soldiers and armoured vehicles could stay on Belgian capital’s streets into next week amid fears of imminent Paris-style attack in the heart of the EU
The Belgian capital remained on lock down on Sunday with soldiers and armoured vehicles patrolling the city. Officials say several terrorists remain at large and Brussels is under threat. The city’s metro system has been closed since Saturday, as have many shops, museums and shopping malls. Professional football and many music events have also been cancelled
Several terrorists remain at large in Brussels and threaten to commit a “very dangerous act”, a senior official has said, as the Belgian capital enters its second day with soldiers and armoured vehicles continuing to keep the city in lockdown.
The mayor of one of Brussels’ municipalities said the area was still facing a grave threat, adding that suspects linked to the Paris terror attack that killed more than 130 last week remain on the run.
Schaerbeek’s mayor, Bernard Clerfayt, said on Sunday: “There are two terrorists in the Brussels region that could commit very dangerous acts.” The Belgian interior minister, Jan Jambon, added “several suspects” tied to the Paris attacks could be at large in the country.
Belgium’s national crisis centre on Saturday raised the threat alert in the Brussels region to level four, which indicates a “serious and immediate threat”. Clerfayt said it was necessary to try to anticipate and prevent any such acts and their consequences. He said: “As long as this threat is present, we must be very attentive.”
Officials said several men were being sought by security authorities amid speculation that a series of cells may be planning attacks in the heart of the EU.
The city’s metro system remained closed on Sunday. Officials were due to meet at noon to decide whether to relax the stringent measures, which have seen public transport restricted, shops shut, shopping malls shuttered, professional football cancelled, concerts called off and music venues, museums, and galleries closed.
A series of scares over suspect packages also raised tensions.
Belgian authorities are searching for Salah Abdeslam, identified as a key organiser of the gun and bomb attacks that killed 130 people in Paris nine days ago. Belgian media have reported sightings of Abdeslam, a 26-year-old Frenchman, in or around Brussels……………………..


Ben Carson’s idea of “political bias” is when people don’t think the Bible has scientific accuracy. Photograph: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
There is an appeal to creationism for certain people: it lies in the ability to submit to a myth without reflection, debate or real understanding. But the ultimate goal in promoting it as a point of legitimate pedagogical inquiry appears to be to coerce the obedience of a superstitious civic collective under a socially and politically regressive leadership.
And now it’s being used in this election cycle to counter intellectual and academic freedom in educational institutions.
Mike Huckabee and Ben Carson have both expressed their support of creationism and denial of evolution, with Carson attributing the teachings of evolution to “the Adversary”, Satan. Carson has promised that, if he becomes president, he would make the US Department of Education withdraw federal funding from institutions that show “extreme political bias”.
Carson’s example of “extreme political bias”? One lone professor who asked students to write “Jesus” on a sheet of paper and stomp on it. Carson omitted to add to his inflammatory account that the professor used the exercise to prove to his communication students that stomping on the word “Jesus” would be a marked example of a failed intercultural communication strategy.
There are legitimate ways to discuss the Bible critically and aesthetically; in the academic context, that can take the form of courses in literature, philosophy, comparative religion and even law. Like other scriptures, biblical stories are exemplary texts of literature that promise many benefits for the alert reader. But there is no valid reason to use creationism where more rigorous methods of scientific inquiry are superior.
The Republican presidential candidates’ public obsession with creationism, though, isn’t really about education. It’s about cementing their Christian credentials with the influential evangelical voting block by announcing their opposition to all that is not heterosexual, Christian and not “speaking American” — whatever that means.


Like this:
Like Loading...
This entry was posted
on Sunday, November 22nd, 2015 at 1:28 pm and is filed under General.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Ben Carson’s idea of “political bias” is when people don’t think the Bible has scientific accuracy. Photograph: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
There is an appeal to creationism for certain people: it lies in the ability to submit to a myth without reflection, debate or real understanding. But the ultimate goal in promoting it as a point of legitimate pedagogical inquiry appears to be to coerce the obedience of a superstitious civic collective under a socially and politically regressive leadership.